aqui te envio el foro de medicina y cirugia. es para el dia 18 tambien el primer post.. muchas gracias.Discusión Grupal Módulo 2: Proceso de Enfermería Aplicado al Adulto y Viejo con Conductas
Inadaptables en la Necesidad de Oxigenación: Fluidos, Electrolitos y Balance Ácido-Base
Discusión grupal módulo 2: Proceso de Enfermería Aplicado al Adulto y Viejo con Conductas
Inadaptables en la Necesidad de Oxigenación: Fluidos, Electrolitos y Balance Ácido-Base
Llega cliente adulto con episodios de vómitos y diarreas. Al hacerle el estimado físico, usted encuentra
los siguientes hallazgos: piel pálida, reseca y escamosa, mucosa oral y lengua escamosa, observa
episodios de desorientación esporádicas y debilidad leve al caminar distancias cortas. Cliente refiere:
“no como ni bebo nada desde ayer”. Al momento, usted no tiene resultados de laboratorios que validen
un posible cuadro de desbalance hidroeléctrico.
Entonces les pregunto: ¿qué usted haría con el cliente para manejar su estado de salud actual?
Argumente su presentación.
Instrucciones
Para contestar el foro, tome en consideración lo siguiente:
1. Cliente no ha sido evaluado por el doctor (no cuenta con órdenes médicas).
2. Concéntrese en intervenciones de enfermería independientes.
3. Valide su aportación con literatura científica, relacionada a la profesión de enfermería y actualizada
(no más de 5 años de publicación).
Favor de leer cuidadosamente las siguientes instrucciones:
1. Conteste exclusivamente, las preguntas guías del foro.
2. Su aportación y presentación al foro debe ser bajo un estricto ambiente de respeto y cordialidad.
3. Siga las reglas gramaticales y de ortografía correctamente.
4. El foro esta programado de manera tal que usted presente su aportación primero antes de tener
acceso a la de sus compañeros de clase.
5. Reaccione a, mínimo, cuatro (5) compañeros de clase.
6. Tanto su presentación como las reacciones a sus compañeros, debe tener un mínimo de 50
palabras. No podrá someter participación ni reacción alguna si no cumple con dicha directriz. No hay
máximo de palabras.
7. Refiérase a las normas de *Netiquette*, , para la redacción correcta de comunicación en línea.
8. Recuerde incluir las referencias y citas según formato APA.
9. De tener algún inconveniente, no dude en comunicarse con su profesora.
Rubrica
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeInitial
Assignment Posting
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeParticipation
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
Posts well
developed
assignment
that fully
addresses
and
develops all
aspects of
the task.
4 pts
Excellent
The student
actively
participated in
the forum in
the period to
carry out this
dynamic of
discussion and
made a
minimum of 4
contributions
to different
partners that
the activity
required.
3 pts
Very Good
Posts well
developed
assignment
that addresses
all aspects of
the task; but
lacks full
development
of concepts.
3 pts
Very Good
The student
participated
actively in the
forum in the
period to carry
out this
dynamic of
discussion and
made only 3
contributions
to different
partners that
the activity
required.
2 pts
Satisfactory
Posts adequate
assignment
with
superficial
thoughts and
without
preparation;
but doesn’t
address all
aspects of the
task.
2 pts
Satisfactory
The student
participated
actively in the
forum in the
period to carry
out this
dynamic of
discussion and
made only 2
contributions
to different
partners that
the activity
required.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
Posts not
adequate
assignment
with
superficial
thoughts no
clear and
without
preparation;
doesn’t
address all
aspects of the
task.
1 pts
Deficient
The student
participated
actively in
the forum in
the period to
carry out this
dynamic of
discussion
and made
only 1
contribution
to different
partners that
the activity
required.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
4 pts
4 pts
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeFollow-Up
Postings and
Participation Relevance
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
The
participation’s
demonstrate a
total mastery
of the topic to
be discussed,
as well as the
integration of
ideas and
information or
knowledge
relevant to the
topic that
enrich the
dialogue
among the
forum
participants.
Sustain your
contributions
with evidence
of sources of
updated
information.
3 pts
Very Good
The
participation’s
demonstrate a
good
command of
the topic to be
discussed, as
well as the
integration of
ideas and
information or
knowledge
relevant to the
topic that
enrich the
dialogue
among the
forum
participants.
In most of the
contributions
made by the
student
support his
opinion with
evidence of
sources of
updated
information.
2 pts
Satisfactory
The
participation’s
demonstrate
an average
domain of the
topic to be
discussed, but
the student
needs to
improve and,
almost does
not manage to
integrate
information or
knowledge
that
complements
the dialogue.
Not in all
contributions
supports their
opinions with
evidence
when debating
the issue.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
The
participation’s
show little or
no dominion
of the topic to
be discussed
and do not
integrate data
or additional
information.
Rarely
sustains your
opinion with
evidence or
information
that
contributes to
the discussion
of the subject.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
4 pts
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeAbility to
Analyze Critically
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
Analyze in
depth the
opinions
expressed by
classmates,
managing to
identify
general ideas,
as well as the
unsound
arguments
presented and
criticize them
constructively.
Making
contributions
based on
evidence that
can support
through
literature.
3 pts
Very Good
It analyzes
carefully the
opinions that
the classmates
express and
frequently
manages to
identify the
general ideas,
as well as the
unsound
arguments that
they present
and in almost
always
criticize them
constructively.
In most of the
occasions it
makes
contributions
to them based
on evidences
that can
sustain
through the
literature
2 pts
Satisfactory
It
superficially
analyzes the
opinions
expressed by
classmates,
and rarely
identifies
general ideas
and their
main
arguments.
Sometimes he
criticizes
them
constructively
and makes
contributions
that sustain
his choice
with literature
related to the
topic of
discussion.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
It does not
analyze the
opinions
expressed by
classmates,
nor does it
identify
general ideas,
nor its
arguments. It
never
criticizes
constructively
the
contributions
of its peers
and does not
make
contributions
that support
its choice
with literature
related to the
topic of
discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
4 pts
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeQuality of
Contributions
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
It constantly
contributes
clear and
critical ideas
that enrich
the dialogue
with
classmates
and help
them move
towards the
construction
of knowledge
based on
evidence
related to the
topic of
discussion.
3 pts
Very Good
It often
contributes
clear and
mostly critical
ideas that
contribute to
enrich the
dialogue with
classmates.
Occasionally,
these help to
move towards
the
construction of
knowledge
based on
evidence
related to the
topic of
discussion.
2 pts
Satisfactory
It brings some
ideas but
often they are
not very clear
or critical.
Only on some
occasions,
they
contribute to
enrich the
dialogue with
classmates.
Rarely
sustains its
choice with
literature
related to the
topic of
discussion.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
It almost does
not make
contributions
and in general,
its ideas are
not clear or
critical, so that
it contributes
little or
nothing to the
dialogue. It
does not
support its
choice with
literature
related to the
topic of
discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
4 pts
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning OutcomeUse
of Nursing Professional
Terminology and
Language
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeInteraction with
Participants
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
In his
participation’s
he expresses
his ideas with
total clarity
and
thoroughness,
correctly
applying the
orthographic,
grammatical
and syntactic
rules, as well
as, an
appropriate
nursing
professional
terminology.
3 pts
Very Good
In his
participation’s,
he expresses
ideas with
enough clarity
and
thoroughness,
applying, in
most cases, the
orthographic,
grammatical
and syntax
rules,
correctly, as
well as the
appropriate
nursing
professional
terminology.
4 pts
Excellent
It establishes
an open
dialogue with
the classmates
and the
professor,
debating and
defending their
ideas, and
building new
contributions
together with
the
participants.
Always
supported by
the literature
and knowledge
of the nursing
discipline.
3 pts
Very Good
Establish a
dialogue with
classmates and
the professor,
contributing in
the construction
of new ideas,
but only
occasionally
debate opinions
about the
subject. In most
of its
contributions, it
is based on the
literature and
knowledge of
the nursing
discipline.
2 pts
Satisfactory
In his
participation’s
he does not
express ideas
very clearly or
thoroughly
and applies
with certain
errors, in the
use of nursing
professional
terminology,
orthographic,
grammatical
and syntax
rules.
2 pts
Satisfactory
Establish a
minimum
dialogue with
colleagues and
the professor,
the
contribution in
the
construction of
new ideas is
little. Rarely,
their
contributions
are supported
by literature
and knowledge
of the nursing
discipline.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
In his
participation
is not
expressed
clearly and
his ideas are
superficial,
writing with
multiple
errors, in the
use of
nursing
professional
terminology,
spelling,
grammar and
syntax rules.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
1 pts
Deficient
Does not
establish a
dialogue
with
colleagues
and the
professor.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
4 pts
4 pts
Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeProfessionalism
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeReferences
Ratings
4 pts
Excellent
Contributes to
discussion
with clear,
concise
comments
formatted in
an easy to
read style that
is free of
grammatical
or spelling
errors. No
unprofessional
comments or
behaviors.
4 pts
Excellent
The student
cites in his
contribution’s
authors of
recent
references (5
years or less of
published)
related to the
topic of the
discussion
forum, written
according to
the latest
edition of
APA.
3 pts
Very Good
Contributes
valuable
information to
discussion
with minor
clarity or
mechanics
errors. Less
than two
grammar
errors no
unprofessional
comments or
behaviors.
3 pts
Satisfactory
In most of its
contributions,
the student
cites authors of
recent
references (5
years or less of
published)
related to the
topic of the
discussion
forum, written
according to
the latest
edition of
APA.
2 pts
Satisfactory
Communicates
in friendly,
courteous and
helpful
manner with
some errors in
clarity or
mechanics.
Less than 5
grammar
errors, no
unprofessional
comments or
behaviors.
2 pts
Satisfactory
On rare
occasions the
student cites
authors of
recent
references (5
years or less
of published)
related to the
topic of the
discussion
forum, written
according to
the latest
edition of
APA.
Pts
1 pts
Deficient
Posts long,
unorganized or
rude content
that may
contain
multiple errors
or may be
inappropriate.
Unprofessional
comment or
behavior.
1 pts
Deficient
The student
never cites
authors of
recent
references
(5 years or
less of
published)
related to
the topic of
the
discussion
forum,
written
according
to the latest
edition of
APA.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his
classmates.
0 pts
Not Present
The student
did not
participate,
nor did he
make
contributions
to his class
4 pts

Purchase answer to see full
attachment




Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.