Develop an 8–12 slide PowerPoint presentation accompanied by an audio recording of the presentation that is a maximum 15 minutes. The presentation will focus on an explanation of Meaningful Use Guidelines and how the current HIM system could be optimized to ensure compliance and improved outcomes. Scenario In this scenario, you will assume the role of Quality Assurance Manager at Vila Health’s Independence Medical Center. You have been asked to review the current electronic health record (EHR) system after some concerns were raised about the system not being fully compliant with new regulations and Meaningful Use Guidelines. After your review, you will present your findings and recommendations to the leadership team. Preparation Review the Vila Health: Analysis of an EHR System media simulation and the information provided in the Resources section to learn more about the Vila Health organization. Before reviewing the EHR system, you will want to familiarize yourself with Meaningful Use Guidelines. Take a moment to review these sources and conduct an additional research as needed on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) incentive program from EHR: Meaningful Use provided in the Resources section. Next, review the Vila Health EHR system. While analyzing the EHR, you will want to think about not only the flow of data, how it moves through the system, and compliance with Meaningful Use Guidelines, but also about the patient experience and implications on quality of care. Consider privacy and security of patient records as well. Vila Health: Analysis of an EHR System Instructions To complete this assessment, you will prepare an 8–12 slide PowerPoint presentation of best practices and emerging models in HIM and EHRs. Your presentation will be assessed using the following criteria: Explain Meaningful Use Guidelines and what they mean to an organization’s current state of compliance. Explain an organization’s current electronic health record system and its data process to meet regulatory guidelines. Analyze how an electronic health record system could improve the quality of care, simplify existing processes, and improve patient outcomes. Explain best practices for an organization to maintain meaningful use compliance as it relates to current incentive programs and policies. Recommend evidence-based approaches for implementing new practices for the end user functions, training, and ongoing compliance. Communicate analysis and recommendations of an electronic health records system in a manner that is clear and concise. Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Below is one potential outline for the presentation that could help you to address the assessments grading criteria. Introduction: Present what Meaningful Use Guidelines are and what they mean to the organization. Present Independence Medical Center’s current state of compliance. Current HIS: State the current EHR being used in this organization. Present your findings on the evaluation of the EHR. Explain how the EHR could improve the quality of care, simplify existing processes, and improve patient outcomes. Discuss how the data are currently captured, tracked, analyzed, and shared and whether each area meets regulatory policy and incentive guidelines. Upgrades and Improvements: Present your findings from your research on maintaining Meaningful Use Guidelines. Present best practices for long-term compliance to current incentive programs and policy. Make additional recommendations on the EHR system including end user functions, training, and ongoing compliance to the department heads. Provide evidence-based recommendations for implementing new practices and emerging models in the identified departments. Additional Requirements Your presentation should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Number of resources: At least one APA formatted in-text citation and accompanying, congruent APA formatted reference. Length of presentation: 8–12 slides. Font and font size: Arial, 18 point or above for headings and explanatory text and 24 point and above for slide titles.Develop an 8–12 slide PowerPoint presentation accompanied by an audio
recording of the presentation that is a maximum 15 minutes. The presentation
will focus on an explanation of Meaningful Use Guidelines and how the
current HIM system could be optimized to ensure compliance and improved
outcomes.
Scenario
In this scenario, you will assume the role of Quality Assurance Manager at Vila
Health’s Independence Medical Center. You have been asked to review the
current electronic health record (EHR) system after some concerns were raised
about the system not being fully compliant with new regulations and Meaningful
Use Guidelines. After your review, you will present your findings and
recommendations to the leadership team.
Preparation
Review the Vila Health: Analysis of an EHR System media simulation and the
information provided in the Resources section to learn more about the Vila
Health organization.
Before reviewing the EHR system, you will want to familiarize yourself with
Meaningful Use Guidelines. Take a moment to review these sources and conduct
an additional research as needed on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) incentive program from EHR: Meaningful Use provided in the
Resources section.
Next, review the Vila Health EHR system. While analyzing the EHR, you will want
to think about not only the flow of data, how it moves through the system, and
compliance with Meaningful Use Guidelines, but also about the patient
experience and implications on quality of care. Consider privacy and security of
patient records as well. Vila Health: Analysis of an EHR System
Instructions
To complete this assessment, you will prepare an 8–12 slide PowerPoint
presentation of best practices and emerging models in HIM and EHRs. Your
presentation will be assessed using the following criteria:
•
•
•
Explain Meaningful Use Guidelines and what they mean to an organization’s
current state of compliance.
Explain an organization’s current electronic health record system and its data
process to meet regulatory guidelines.
Analyze how an electronic health record system could improve the quality of
care, simplify existing processes, and improve patient outcomes.
Explain best practices for an organization to maintain meaningful use
compliance as it relates to current incentive programs and policies.
• Recommend evidence-based approaches for implementing new practices for
the end user functions, training, and ongoing compliance.
• Communicate analysis and recommendations of an electronic health records
system in a manner that is clear and concise.
• Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting
citations and references using current APA style.
Below is one potential outline for the presentation that could help you to address
the assessments grading criteria.
•
•
•
•
Introduction:
• Present what Meaningful Use Guidelines are and what they mean to the
organization.
• Present Independence Medical Center’s current state of compliance.
Current HIS:
• State the current EHR being used in this organization.
• Present your findings on the evaluation of the EHR.
• Explain how the EHR could improve the quality of care, simplify
existing processes, and improve patient outcomes.
• Discuss how the data are currently captured, tracked, analyzed, and
shared and whether each area meets regulatory policy and incentive
guidelines.
Upgrades and Improvements:
• Present your findings from your research on maintaining Meaningful
Use Guidelines.
• Present best practices for long-term compliance to current incentive
programs and policy.
• Make additional recommendations on the EHR system including end
user functions, training, and ongoing compliance to the department
heads.
• Provide evidence-based recommendations for implementing new
practices and emerging models in the identified departments.
•
Additional Requirements
Your presentation should meet the following requirements:
•
Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that
detract from the overall message.
•
•
•
•
•
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current
APA style and formatting guidelines.
Number of resources: At least one APA formatted in-text citation and
accompanying, congruent APA formatted reference.
Length of presentation: 8–12 slides.
Font and font size: Arial, 18 point or above for headings and explanatory text
and 24 point and above for slide titles.
Analysis of Electronic Health Records System
Scoring Guide
NONPERFORMANC
E
BASIC
PROFICIENT
Explain
Meaningful
Use Guidelines
and what they
mean to an
organization’s
current state of
compliance.
Does not
explain
Meaningful
Use Guidelines
and what they
mean to an
organization’s
current state of
compliance.
Explains
Meaningful
Use Guidelines,
but does not
relate them to
an
organization’s
current state of
compliance.
Explains
Meaningful
Use Guidelines
and what they
mean to an
organization’s
current state of
compliance.
Explains
Meaningful
Use Guidelines
and what they
mean to an
organization’s
current state of
compliance,
and notes areas
of unclear or
incomplete
information for
which
clarification
could improve
the explanation.
Explain an
organization’s
current
electronic
health record
system and its
data process to
meet
regulatory
guidelines.
Does not
explain an
organization’s
current
electronic
health record
system and its
data process to
meet
regulatory
guidelines.
Explains an
organization’s
current
electronic
health record
system, but
does not relate
how its data
processes to
meet regulatory
guidelines.
Explains an
organization’s
current
electronic
health record
system and its
data process to
meet
regulatory
guidelines.
Explains an
organization’s
current
electronic
health record
system and its
data process to
meet regulatory
guidelines and
identifies areas
where data
process does
not fully meet
CRITERIA
DISTINGUISHE
D
CRITERIA
NONPERFORMANC
E
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHE
D
regulatory
guidelines.
Analyze how
an electronic
health record
system could
improve the
quality of care,
simplify
existing
processes, and
improve
patient
outcomes.
Does not
analyze an
electronic
health record
system.
Analyzes an
electronic
health record,
but the analysis
is incomplete
or unclear with
regards to how
the EHR could
improve the
quality of care,
simplify
existing
processes, and
improve patient
outcomes.
Analyzes how
an electronic
health record
system could
improve the
quality of care,
simplify
existing
processes, and
improve
patient
outcomes.
Analyzes how
an electronic
health record
system could
improve the
quality of care,
simplify
existing
processes, and
improve patient
outcomes;
impartially
considers
conflicting
evidence and
other
perspectives.
Explain best
practices for an
organization to
maintain
meaningful use
compliance as
it relates to
current
incentive
programs and
policies.
Does not
explain best
practices to
maintain
compliance
with regards to
meaningful
use.
Explains best
practices to
maintain
compliance
with regards to
meaningful use.
Does not fully
relate
explanation to
an organization
or current
incentive
programs and
policies.
Explains best
practices for an
organization to
maintain
meaningful use
compliance as
it relates to
current
incentive
programs and
policies.
Explains best
practices for an
organization to
maintain
meaningful use
compliance as
it relates to
current
incentive
programs and
policies; also,
acknowledges
potential
challenges an
organization
may face in
applying the
best practices.
CRITERIA
NONPERFORMANC
E
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHE
D
Recommend
evidence-based
approaches for
implementing
new practices
for end user
functions,
training, and
ongoing
compliance.
Does not
identify
evidence that
would inform
implementatio
n, training, or
compliance.
Identifies
evidence that
would inform
implementation
, training, or
compliance.
However, there
is not a
recommendatio
n of evidencebased
approaches, and
does not
address all
three aspects.
Recommends
evidence-based
approaches for
implementing
new practices
for end user
functions,
training, and
ongoing
compliance.
Recommends
evidence-based
approaches for
implementing
new practices
for end user
functions,
training, and
ongoing
compliance.
Identifies
criteria that
could be used
to evaluate the
effectiveness of
recommendatio
ns.
Communicate
analysis and
recommendatio
ns of an
electronic
health records
system in a
manner that is
clear and
concise.
Does not
communicate
analysis and
recommendatio
ns in a way
that is clear or
concise.
Communicates
analysis and
recommendatio
ns, but the
approach is
somewhat
unclear, or
there are
mechanical
writing errors
that reduce the
effectiveness of
communication
.
Communicates
analysis and
recommendatio
ns of an
electronic
health records
system in a
manner that is
clear and
concise.
Communicates
analysis and
recommendatio
ns of an
electronic
health records
system in a
manner that is
clear and
concise; the
written content
is mechanically
accurate with
correct use of
grammar,
punctuation,
and spelling.
Integrate
relevant
sources to
support
assertions,
Does not
integrate
relevant
sources to
support
assertions;
Sources lack
relevance or are
poorly
integrated, or
citations or
references are
Integrates
relevant
sources to
support
assertions,
correctly
Integrates
relevant
sources to
support
assertions,
correctly
CRITERIA
correctly
formatting
citations and
references
using current
APA style.
NONPERFORMANC
E
does not
correctly
format
citations and
references
using current
APA style
BASIC
incorrectly
formatted.
PROFICIENT
formatting
citations and
references
using current
APA style.
DISTINGUISHE
D
formatting
citations and
references
using current
APA style,
which are free
from all errors.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.