Social Work Assignment: Conducting a Diagnostic Interview With a Mental Status Exam

  Before tender through cue sentence making, a gregarious worker needs to influence an meeting that builds on a biopsychogregarious toll. New size are ascititious that exculpate the timing, species, and conconsequence of symptoms in the cue meeting. The Intangible Status Exam (MSE) is a deal-out of that arrangement. The MSE is calculated to uniformly aid cueians identify patterns or syndromes of a person’s apprehensive functioning. It includes very deal-outicular, trodden observations about pretend and other signs of which the client sway not be troddenly informed. When the cue meeting is total, the cueian has far more particular about the fluctuations and narrative of symptoms the enduring self-reports, parallel delay the trodden observations of the MSE. This union extremely improves the chances of considerate individuality. Conducting the MSE and other peculiar cue elements in a structured but client-sensitive carriage helps that design. In this Assignment, you use on the role of a gregarious worker influenceing an MSE. To prepare: Watch the video describing an MSE. Then guard the Sommers-Flanagan (2014) “Mental Status Exam” video curtail. Make unfailing to use notes on the nine domains of the meeting. Review the Morrison (2014) balbutiation on the elements of a cue meeting. Review the 9 Areas to evaluate for a Intangible Status Exam and copy cue compendium write-up supposing in this Week’s instrument. Review the fact copy of a cue compendium write-up supposing in this Week’s instrument. Write up a Cue Compendium including the Intangible Status Exam for Carl inveterate upon his meeting delay Dr. Sommers-Flanagan. Submit a 2- to 3-page fact presentation paper in which you total twain size outlined below:     Part I: Cue Compendium and MSE Provide a cue compendium of the client, Carl. Within this compendium include: Identifying Data/Client demographics Chief complaint/Presenting Problem Present illness Past psychiatric illness Substance use narrative Past medical narrative Family narrative Mental Status Exam (Be negotiative and neat for all nine areas) Appearance Behavior or psychomotor activity Attitudes inland the meetinger or examiner Affect and mood Speech and meditation Perceptual disturbances Orientation and consciousness Memory and intelligence Reliability, judiciousness, and insight Part II: Separation of MSE After completing Deal-out I of the Assignment, afford an separation and evince important meditation (befriended by references) in your rejoinder to the following: Identify any areas in your MSE that claim follow-up postulates assemblage. Explain how using the cross-cutting meaunfailing would add to the instruction collected. Do Carl’s answers add to your ability to diagnose him in any inequitable way? Why or why not? Would you sift-canvass a possible individuality delay Carl at opportunity purpose in opportunity? Why? Support Deal-out II delay citations/references. The DSM 5 and fact study do not need to be cited.  Utilize the other route balbutiations to help your rejoinder.    Morrison, J. (2014). Individuality made easier: Principles and techniques for intangible bloom clinicians (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Chapter 10, “Diagnosis and the Intangible Status Exam” (pp. 119–126) Chapter 17, “Beyond Diagnosis: Compliance, Suicide, Violence” (pp. 271–280)