Bvhjg

That the deponent has improved the accompanied political subwork-for which is slight to yield on the basis enslaved therein. The basis of the plaint may seekeous-inclined be learn as dissect and bundle of this contact as seekeous. 2. That the deponent had cheerful prima facie instance in this favour. 3. That there is a anticipation of giving walk note to the corporate corporation/accused anteriorly filing any subserve/litigation counter the Corporate Corporation/defendant. 4. That deponent is empower to work-for walk note to the accused due to bankruptcy of adequate occasion as accused had manufactured munadi counter the deponent on limitd 02. 2. 2010 for dealing the tenure amid three days incorrectly accused conciliate be at freedom to dealing tenure as they feel besides outcomed note limitd 10. 09. 2010 dedicated by the accused, in rejoinder to that deponent has improved objections to the foregoing note vide contacts limitd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are fast alongwith. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the discontinuance of my affidavit are gentleman and redress to my recognition. No dissect of it is fiction and dot has been private therein.Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Contact for immunity from giving walk note to the Corporate Corporation/defendant. RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:- 1. That the accuser has improved the accompanied political subwork-for which is slight to yield on the basis enslaved therein. The basis of the plaint may seekeous-inclined be learn as dissect and bundle of this contact as seekeous. 2.That the accuser had cheerful prima facie instance in this favour. 3. That there is a anticipation of giving walk note to the corporate corporation/accused anteriorly filing any subserve/litigation counter the Corporate Corporation/defendant. 4. That accuser is empower to work-for walk note to the accused due to bankruptcy of adequate occasion as accused had manufactured munadi counter the accuser on limitd 02. 12. 2010 for dealing the tenure amid three days incorrectly accused conciliate be at freedom to dealing tenure as they feel besides outcomed note limitd 10. 9. 2010 dedicated by the accused, in rejoinder to that accuser has improved objections to the foregoing note vide contacts limitd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are fast alongwith. It is consequently, deferencefully prayed that the give contact may seekeous-inclined be undisputed, in the object of integrity. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant Through Instruction (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…DefendantApplication U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 learn after a while individuality 151 CPC for stringent the accuseds in obtrusive in the loyal holding of the subwork-for attribute or dealing any division of the subwork-for attribute during the pendency of the give subserve. Respectfully Showeth: 1. That the accuser has improved the accompanied political subwork-for which is slight to yield on the basis enslaved therein. The basis of the plaint may seekeous-inclined be learn as dissect and bundle of this contact as seekeous. 2. That the accuser had cheerful prima facie instance in this favour. 3. That poise of spare-space is besides in favour of the accuser. 4.That the accuser conciliate tolerate incurable waste and waste, which cannot be enriched in any kind whatsoever, if the accuseds are not restrained from obtrusive in the loyal holding of the subwork-for attribute or dealing any division of the subwork-for attribute. It is consequently, deferencefully prayed that the contact may seekeous-inclined be undisputed and the accuseds may seekeous-inclined be restrained from obtrusive in the loyal holding of the subwork-for attribute or dealing any division of the subwork-for attribute. Place: Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010 Applicant Through Instruction (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati)Advocate Instruction for the accuser IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh. I, the over determined deponent do hereby solemnly asseverate and state as under:- 1. That the deponent has improved the accompanied political subwork-for which is slight to yield on the basis enslaved therein. The basis of the plaint may seekeous-inclined be learn as dissect and bundle of this contact as seekeous. . That the deponent had cheerful prima facie instance in this favour. 3. That poise of spare-space is besides in favour of the deponent. 4. That the deponent conciliate tolerate incurable waste and waste, which cannot be enriched in any kind whatsoever, if the accuseds are not restrained from obtrusive in the loyal holding of the subwork-for attribute or dealing any division of the subwork-for attribute. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the discontinuance of my affidavit are gentleman and redress to my recognition. No dissect of it is fiction and dot has been private therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. __________OF 2010 Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass sojourner of Village Hallo Majra, UT. Chandigarh. …Plaintiff Versus 1. Corporate Corporation, UT, Chandigarh through its Commissioner, Sector 17, Chandigarh. 2. Chandigarh Administration through its Home Secretary, U. T. , Secretariat, Sector 7, Chandigarh. 3. Shiv Pal s/o Sh. Ram Asra R/o Friends Bakery, Near Kabari Market, Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. …Defendants Subwork-for for mandatory command for elucidation privately note limitd 10. . 2010 (Annexure P-7) outcomed by the accused No. 1. AND Subwork-for for persistent command stringent the accuseds 1&2 from obtrusive into the loyal holding of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits rank of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, restricted as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh North Attribute recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street.AND Subwork-for for persistent command directing the accuseds No. & 2 not to deal any dissect of the House No. 26 of the accuser, past the identical is exclusively moderate in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, after a whileout delineation of the subwork-for attribute in nearness of the accuser. AND In the choice, subwork-for for mandatory command directing the accused No. 3 to form cheerful the subwork-for attribute of the accuser dissipationd from the accused no. 3, in instance, the subwork-for attribute is establish to be further the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits rank of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the House No. 26 is situated in Khasra No. 98 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, belongs to the accuser. The accuser dissipationd the subwork-for attribute vide sale conformity limitd 19. 1. 2006 from the accused no. 3 and remunerated the perfect motive whole of Rs. 7. 00 lacs to accused no. 3. The accused no. 3 besides manufactured an affidavit acknowledging the sale of subwork-for attribute measuring 20’ X 22’ and reception of bountiful 7 decisive motive figure. The representation of the sale conformity and an affidavit are fast as Annexure P-1 & P-2 deferenceively. 2. That the subwork-for attribute is situated in Khasra No. 198 of the fruits rank of Village Hallo Majra, U.T. , Chandigarh which is close to the Lal Dora of the Village. The map of village Hallo Majra showing the residuum of Khasra No. 198 is fast as Annexure P-3. The top cunning of the subwork-for attribute after a while its boundaries is fast as Annexure P-4 3. That the accuser dissipationd subwork-for attribute which was establish up to two rooms area measuring 22’ x 22’. After the dissipation of the subwork-for attribute, the accuser constructed earliest foot of 2nd Foot in the subwork-for attribute. The accuser obtained electrical concatenation from the signed contractor and soak concatenation from the Chandigarh Administration.The representation of the electricity bills & soak bills are fast as Annexure P-5 & P-6 deferenceively. 4. That past 19. 1. 2006, the accuser is enjoying the subwork-for attribute after a whileout any break from anybody. Unfortunately, the accused no. 1 outcomed note on 10. 9. 2010 claiming therein that the subwork-for attribute has encroached upon the Government plant. The representation of the note limitd 10. 9. 2010 is fast is Annexure P-7. 5. That pursuant to the note sent by the accused no. 1, the accuser improved objections on 21. 9. 2010 and besides on 29. 9. 2010. The representation of the objections is fast as Annexure P-8.Even the accuser made an contact limitd 29. 9. 2010 to the Tehsildar, U. T. , Chandigarh for delineation of Khasra No. 198 of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh in the nearness of the accuser. The representation of the contact limitd 29. 9. 2010 is fast as Annexure P-9. 6. That the village Hallo Majra was merged after a while Corporate Corporation, Chandigarh vide U. T. , Administration note limitd 19. 9. 2006. The U. T. , Administration vide note limitd 25. 5. 2009 (Annexure P-10) has ruled that simply the abadi Deh of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh has been merged in the Corporate Corporation, Chandigarh.It media that Corporate Corporation has no sway to outcome note limitd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7), in-reference-to the subwork-for attribute which is moderate in Khasra No. 198. 7. That the subwork-for attribute is exclusively moderate inn Khasra No. 198 in the fruits rank of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. No dissect of the subwork-for attribute is on the Government Land. 8. That notwithstanding the contact made by the accuser, the accuseds No. 1 & 2 feel not demarcated the plant of the accuser, in his nearness. 9. That accused no. 1 outcomed another note by way of munadi on limitd 02. 12. 010 vide which decisive reminder for dealing the tenure amid three days, forasmuch-as in deference to the note limitd 10. 09. 2010 accuser has already improved objections and contact for delineation of Khasra No. 198 vide divergent contacts limitd 21. 9. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010 deferenceively. In deference to those contact no exercise has been enslaved by the accuseds no. 1 & 2 cultivate limit. 10. That accused no. 1 has not dedicated a uncombined haphazard to establish the bonafide of the accuser and they feel enslaved the exercise for dealing the subwork-for attribute rather than making the delineation manufactured of Khasra No. 98 situated in Village Hallo Majra.11. That the act of the accused no. 1 & 2 is extremely absolute and unfair consequently the satisfresuscitation of this Hon’ble Seek is extremely designated for protecting the important set-right of the accuser i. e. set-right to speed and security. 12. That in instance the delineation of the subwork-for attribute including perfect Khasra No. 198, is manufactured in the nearness of the accuser and if it is establish that any dissect of the subwork-for attribute is further the Khasra No. 198, then it is the accused No. 3 who is bound to form cheerful the attribute sold by him to the accuser. 3. That the subwork-for attribute is situated amid the territorial sway of this Hon’ble Court, future, this Hon’ble Seek has sway to try and decide the subserve. 14. That the object of exercise to the accusers on 10. 9. 2010, when the accused No. 1 work-ford note to the accuser. 15. That the alienate seek fee has been afunwandering on the plaint. It is, consequently deferencefully prayed that:- a)Suit for mandatory command for elucidation privately note limitd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7) outcomed by the accused No. 1, may seekeous-inclined be decreed. ) Subwork-for for persistent command stringent the accuseds 1&2 from obtrusive into the loyal holding of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits rank of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, restricted as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh NorthProperty recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street. May seekeous-inclined be decreed. c) Subwork-for for persistent command directing the accuseds No. 1 & 2 not to deal any dissect of the House No. 6 of the accuser, past the identical is exclusively moderate in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, after a whileout delineation of the subwork-for attribute in nearness of the accuser, may seekeous-inclined be decreed. d) In the choice, subwork-for for mandatory command directing the accused No. 3 to form cheerful the subwork-for attribute of the accuser dissipationd from the accused no. 3, in instance, the subwork-for attribute is establish to be further the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits rank of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, may seekeous-inclined be decreed. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff Through Instruction Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates Instruction for the accuser Verification:- Verified that the discontinuance of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are gentleman and redress to my recognition and discontinuance of para no. 13-15 are established on allowable classify. No dissect of it is crime and dot has been private therein. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh.I, the over determined deponent do hereby solemnly asseverate and state as under:- 1. That the deponent has improved the accompanied political subwork-for and the identical has been drafted on my instructions. The deponent is seekeous learned after a while the basis of the instance. 2. That the discontinuance of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are gentleman and redress to my recognition and discontinuance of para no. 13-15 are established on allowable classify. No dissect of it is crime and dot has been private therein. 3. That the accuser has not improved any such or concordant antecedent in any seek of law. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:-Verified that the discontinuance of my affidavit are gentleman and redress to my recognition. No dissect of it is fiction and dot has been private therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF SH. RANJEEV KUMAR, RENT CONTROLLER, UT, CHANDIGARH IN RE:- SATPAL GUPTA VS. JAIPAL & ANR Contact U/s 151 CPC for issuance of directions to the respondents to minister the representation of annexure mentioned in their written declaration as seekeous as contact for discardment the fissure request, improved by the respondents Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the over notable fissure request is pending anteriorly this Hon’ble Seek and is unwandering for today i. . 03. 12. 2010 for filing of rejoinder to the contact for discardment of the fissure request and rejoinder. 2. That on developed limit of hearing i. e. 16. 10. 2010, the respondent improved the written declaration, an contact for discardment the fissure request and annexures. The undersigned instruction for the respondents provided the representation of written declaration and contact for discardment of fissure request to the undersigned instruction for the requester. However the instruction for the respondents did not minister the copies of annexures mentioned in written declaration as seekeous as contact to instruction for the requester.The instruction for the respondent safe the instruction for the requester he conciliate minister the representation of the annexures mentioned in the written declaration and contact amid 2-3 days but a number of occasions the instruction for the requester demanded the copies of annexures but he has failed to do so, future the give contact and the undersigned instruction for the requester is disqualified to improve rejoinder as seekeous as rejoinder to the contact for discardment of the fissure request after a whileout annexures. 3. That the Hon’ble Seek mentioned his zemine classify limitd 16. 0. 2010 in the give instance. The copies provided to the requester. It is, consequently deferencefully prayed that the directions may seekeous-inclined be dedicated to the respondents to minister the copies of annexures mentioned in the written declaration and contact for discardment and besides be supposing some occasion to improve the rejoinder and rejoinder to the contact, to the requester, in the object of integrity. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant/ Mendicant Through Instruction (Sandeep Sharma, Reetu Sharma & Raj Kumar Saroj) Advocates