Discussion 1: Compare and Contrast the Four Models for Proposal Development

   When discloseing and implementing a allow pur-pose, the allowee must deem the device organization and disgusting standards for pur-pose outgrowth. Understanding this frameeffort succors to smooth strain the pur-pose and determine that deemation has been consecrated to selecting the alienate instrument required to convey out the device.  There are disgusting standards that can be used for pur-pose outgrowth and implementation: inequitable, consultative, cooperative, and collaborative. Working as an inequitable may be satisfactory for smaller devices or a escort. However, the consultative, cooperative, and collaborative standards may be required to convey out over close effort. Each of these standards implicate mindful deemation of the required equalize of instrument, collaboration, and partnerships.  In making-ready for this Discussion, deem the disgusting standards of pur-pose outgrowth as well-mannered-mannered as when each form of pur-pose is alienate. Review this week’s Learning Instrument that focuses on these standards. Reflect upon the characteristics of supplicatory letter conversant in Module 2. By Day 3 of Week 3 Post the subjoined to the Discourse consultation: In a 2- to 3-slide PowerPoint delivery after a while      recorded voiceover, parallel and dissimilarity the disgusting standards of pur-pose      outgrowth (individual, consultative, cooperative, and collaborative) and      how each standard would effort in your allow-funded device. Persuade your      classmates why your cherished of one of these disgusting standards is most      appropriately aligned after a while your designed device.  Be stable to patronage your dissection and conclusions after a while citations and references in APA format from the Learning Instrument and your own discovery. By Day 5 of Week 3 Comment on at last three of your confederates’ columns in one or over of the subjoined ways: Ask a piercing investigation environing a confederate’s cherished in      selecting their standard. Clarify any assumptions and/or gaps that he or she      needs to address. Share a riches after a while a confedereprove that patronages the use      of the standard he or she has clarified. Discussion 2: Letter Goals and Objectives for Your Grant A view is a unconcealed proposition of what you trust to perfect after a while your allow. In allow letter, there are 2-5 views. Goals are liberal unconcealedizations and are formless, not measurable. Each view is environing the upshot or impacts your allow-funded heartiness advice program is going to perfect. In your views, you shortness to grasp the eye of the allow reviewers. Your views must loop tail to your needs proposition.  An concrete is straightly tied to the view the allow seeker is unamenable to complete through allow funding opportunities. Objectives are very targeted and grasp the upshot(s) that achieve succor perfect the view the concrete addresses. In allow letter, SMART concrete letter contact should regularly employ. SMART stands for inequitable, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-phased. There should be 2-5 concretes for each view, and there should be abundance concretes to perfect the view.   Below is an pattern view and an concrete for a view. Goal #1: Acception substantial temper in manifestation and their parents in Wilmington, Delaware through the “Walking for Life” heartiness advice program. Objective 1A: At the end of the foremost six months of the “Walking for Life” heartiness advice program, 100 parents and their manifestation achieve acception their daily substantial temper to walking at last one mile. For this week’s discourse consultation, you achieve be sharing your heartiness advice program’s needs proposition, two views, and two concretes. Determine all volume of the columning are aligned to superintendlines and requirements contained in the RFP.  Note: To be reverential of your peers, in providing feedtail that achieve be suited to them as they finalize their Needs Statement, Goals, and Objectives for Assignment 1, you are encouraged to column your responses to your confederates by Day 5. By Day 3 of Week 4 Post the subjoined: Your Needs Statement, Goals and Objectives. Please use the subjoined templates to disclose your views and concretes. To disclose a view, use the template beneath and appoint in the blanks and compose a sentence: __________________ (Increase or decline) __________________ (what) __________________ (in whom) __________________ (where) __________________. (in the spectry of your heartiness advice program). To disclose SMART concretes, use the template beneath and appoint in the blanks and compose a sentence: By_____/_____/_____, WHEN—Time bound _____________________________________________ WHO/WHAT----Specific from _____________________ to __________________________. MEASURE after a while a calculate, reprove, percentage of fluctuate, or baseline—Measurable Be stable to patronage your dissection and conclusions after a while citations and references in APA format from the Learning Instrument and your own discovery. Gitlin, L. N., & Lyons, K. J. (2014). Successful allow letter: Strategies for heartiness and anthropological use professionals (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer. · Chapter 5, “Common Sections of Proposals,” pp. 79–104 · Chapter 6, “Strategies for Effective Writing,” pp. 105–115 · Chapter 7, “Common Pitfalls in Pur-pose Writing,” p. 117–124 · Chapter 8, “Writing Considerations for Inequitable Discovery Proposals,” pp. 125–133 Blanco, M. A., Gruppen, L. D., Artino, A. R., Jr., Uijtdehaage, S., Szauter, K., & Durning, S. J. (2015). How to transcribe an adviceal discovery allow: AMEE Superintend No. 101. Medical Teacher, 38(2), 113–122. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1087483 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Disclose SMART concretes. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/phcommunities/resourcekit/evaluate/smart_objectives.html Community Tool Box. (n.d.). Letter a allow contact for funding. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/writing-grant-application Department of Heartiness and Anthropological Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Letter SMART concretes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief3b.pdf Devine, E. B. (2009). The art of obtaining allows. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 66, 580–587. doi:10.2146/ajhp070320 University of Wisconsin-Extension. (n.d.). Logic standards. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from http://fyi.uwex.edu/programdevelopment/logic-models/ Hartshorn, P. (2014). Making your allow pur-pose supplicatory. At the Center, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.atcmag.com/Issues/ID/155/Making-Your-Grant-Proposal-Persuasive Stokes, K. (2012). Letter open propositions of needs and views for allow pur-poses. AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal, 27(1), 25–28. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic standard outgrowth superintend. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/LogicModel.pdf